my photo in Yichang, China

Comments

三字经

人之初,性本善。性相近,习相远。苟不教,性乃迁。教之道,贵以专。
昔孟母,择邻处。子不学,断机杼。窦燕山,有义方。教五子,名俱扬。
养不教,父之过。教不严,师之惰。子不学,非所宜。幼不学,老何为。
玉不琢,不成器。人不学,不知义。为人子,方少时。亲师友,习礼仪。
香九龄,能温席。孝于亲,所当执。融四岁,能让梨。弟于长,宜先知。
首孝弟,次见闻。知某数,识某文。一而十,十而百。百而千,千而万。
三才者,天地人。三光者,日月星。三纲者,君臣义。父子亲,夫妇顺。
曰春夏,曰秋冬。此四时,运不穷。曰南北,曰西东。此四方,应乎中。
曰水火,木金土。此五行,本乎数。曰仁义,礼智信。此五常,不容紊。
稻粱菽,麦黍稷。此六谷,人所食。马牛羊,鸡犬豕。此六畜,人所饲。
曰喜怒,曰哀惧。爱恶欲,七情具。□土革,木石金。与丝竹,乃八音。
高曾祖,父而身。身而子,子而孙。自子孙,至元曾。乃九族,而之伦。
父子恩,夫妇从。兄则友,弟则恭。长幼序,友与朋。君则敬,臣则忠。
此十义,人所同。

凡训蒙,须讲究。详训诂,名句读。为学者,必有初。小学终,至四书。
论语者,二十篇。群弟子,记善言。孟子者,七篇止。讲道德,说仁义。
作中庸,子思笔。中不偏,庸不易。作大学,乃曾子。自修齐,至平治。
孝经通,四书熟。如六经,始可读。诗书易,礼春秋。号六经,当讲求。
有连山,有归藏。有周易,三易详。有典谟,有训诰。有誓命,书之奥。
我周公,作周礼。著六官,存治体。大小戴,注礼记。述圣言,礼乐备。
曰国风,曰雅颂。号四诗,当讽咏。诗既亡,春秋作。寓褒贬,别善恶。
三传者,有公羊。有左氏,有彀梁。经既明,方读子。撮其要,记其事。
五子者,有荀杨。文中子,及老庄。

经子通,读诸史。考世系,知终始。
自羲农,至黄帝。号三皇,居上世。
唐有虞,号二帝。相揖逊,称盛世。夏有禹,商有汤。周文王,称三王。
夏传子,家天下。四百载,迁夏社。汤伐夏,国号商。六百载,至纣亡。
周武王,始诛纣。八百载,最长久。周辙东,王纲堕。逞干戈,尚游说。
始春秋,终战国。五霸强,七雄出。嬴秦氏,始兼并。传二世,楚汉争。
高祖兴,汉业建。至孝平,王莽篡。光武兴,为东汉。四百年,终于献。
魏蜀吴,争汉鼎。号三国,迄两晋。宋齐继,梁陈承。为南朝,都金陵。
北元魏,分东西。宇文周,兴高齐。迨至隋,一土宇。不再传,失统绪。
唐高祖,起义师。除隋乱,创国基。二十传,三百载。梁义之,国乃改。
炎宋兴,受周禅。十八传,南北混。辽于金,皆称帝。太祖兴,国大明。
号洪武,都金陵。迨成祖,迁燕京。十六世,至崇祯。阉乱后,寇内讧。
闯逆变,神器终。清顺治,据神京。至十传,宣统逊。举总统,共和成。
复汉土,民国兴。

廿二史,全在兹。载治乱,知兴衰。读史书,考实录。通古今,若亲目。
口而诵,心而惟。朝于斯,夕于斯。昔仲尼,师项□。古圣贤,尚勤学。
赵中令,读鲁论。彼既仕,学且勤。披蒲编,削竹简。彼无书,且知勉。
头悬梁,锥刺股。彼不教,自勤苦。如囊萤,如映雪。家虽贫,学不缀。
如负薪,如挂角。身虽劳,犹苦卓。苏老泉,二十七。始发愤,读书籍。
彼既老,犹悔迟。尔小生,宜早思。若梁□,八十二。对大廷,魁多士。
彼既成,众称异。尔小生,宜立志。莹八岁,能咏诗。泌七岁,能赋□。
彼颖悟,人称奇。尔幼学,当效之。蔡文姬,能辨琴。谢道□,能咏吟。
彼女子,且聪敏。尔男子,当自警。唐刘晏,方七岁。举神童,作正字。
彼虽幼,身己仕。尔幼学,勉而致。有为者,亦若是。

犬守夜,鸡司晨。苟不学,曷为人。蚕吐丝,蜂酿蜜。人不学,不如物。
幼而学,壮而行。上致君,下泽民。扬名声,显父母。光于前,裕于后。
人遗子,金满嬴。我教子,惟一经。勤有功,戏无益。戒之哉,宜勉力。
a copy of chinese traditional education book.

Comments

Levels of Accessibility Knowledge

I admit in advance that I am about to flirt with an Internet meme, the “Internet meme” (often mispronounced as though it were French and used a circumflex). But if dashing Swede Rohgayr Johansson can delineate levels of HTML knowledge and a somewhat-less-dashing Swede can delineate levels of CSS knowledge, perhaps it is time for… Levels of Accessibility Knowledge.

Accessibility Level 0

A user level, not a developer level. People at this level discovered the Internet early on (in 2001) and experience it to this day through the bedazzling prisms known as Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Hotmail, MSN Messenger, and Microsoft Internet Explorer. As do all their friends. Hence they have no cause to imagine any form of deviation beyond 98 vs. XP vs. ME (“which sucks”), let alone missing an eye or a hand.

Accessibility Level 1

Only now does the band come out on stage. (Admittedly, the venue is a high-school gymnasium, but still.) These developers have read enough help files in FrontPage to know an alt tag is there to give you a tooltip on an image. alt="25 % off all brass fasteners limited timeonly !" Has seen blind people on American TV shows, and knows the first thing they will ask you is “Can I feel your face?”

Accessibility Level 2

Is aware that spacer GIFs are tedious for screen-reader users to listen to and wouldn’t be caught dead subjecting a blind person to something as jejune as a filename. So alt="spacer!" it is. Aware of the controversy involving table usage; developer’s layout tables are fully qualified with summary="This table is used for layout purposes only". (Such declaration is duplicated in a table title attribute that helpfully follows the mouse cursor around the page.) Uses XHTML because it’s “better,” but hasn’t figured out how to save a Unicode file on their Windows system yet, turning a simple copyright symbol into a string of comic-book profanities. Is a cochair of the WCAG Working Group.

Accessibility Level 3

These l33t-style developers know that tables r teh sux0r and use CSS for everything. Unfortunately, they are so preoccupied with said CSS that they overlook the structure of their pages, which end up as a jumble of divs. Has bookmarked WCAG – once. Here the skip-navigation link makes its début, dressed as a 1×1-pixel GIF with a cunning alt tag. Sadly, the target for such a link is an ordinary element set adrift in the flotsam of divs, and the developer can never quite figure out why it manifests itself in the same colour and underline style as the rest of the page’s links. Owns GoLive 4.

Accessibility Level 4

Knows who I am, agrees I’m right most of the time, but thinks I’m a twat nonetheless. Has his (sic) own podcast on iTunes but can’t be arsed to transcribe it. Has a large RSS feed and follows the tag accessibility. Reads Zeldman. Is not a very good visual designer, but creates well-structured code, one page at a time, in Homesite. (Fears the day when Homesite ceases to function in a future Windows version.) Runs a small freelance business from his bedsit. Tries to “include accessibility” in his contracts. Can speak seemingly knowledgeably at meetups.

Accessibility Level 5

Pitches Zeldman for articles and finally gets one published. Has username on Accessify Forum. Pays own money – it’s deductible – to attend Web-standards conferences. Is too polite to publicly correct Level 4 developer at meetups, but writes thinly-disguised blog posts upon return home. Has a spouse with a day job. Knows what WAI is. Works for an ad agency or Web shop run by Level 2s and covertly adds skip links and correct alt texts to every job he touches. (And then covertly puts them back when removed, pursuing a cat-and-mouse game on the CVS.) Has watched sign-language interpreter at church.

Accessibility Level 6

Has small but profitable Web shop. Coauthored Friends of Ed book; business partners have coauthored O’Reilly books and/or have colour deficiency. Writes front-page posts on Accessify Forum. Has cooed at Zeldman’s baby. Smokes. Has attempted to contribute to WAI process or has resigned from actual job with WAI. Has well-tuned Windows system; said system is decked out with all the toys, including necessary utilities and software his Mac friends cannot use to verify their accessibility claims. Speaks at Web-standards conferences. Hosts visiting fellow developers in spare bedroom. Is a competent visual designer with high-level coding skills. Has touched a Braille display and wondered what the fuss was about. Writes own CMS – in Perl, as PHP is more suited to commoners – and idly considers migrating to Ruby on Rails. Actually cares what Ruby on Rails is.

Accessibility Level 7

Runs small but unprofitable freelance business from “emerging,” shabby-“chic” neighbourhood with heavy metals in the soil. Author of minor star in gauzy firmament of accessibility books. Interested in subtopics so obscure even the actual disabled subgroups affected don’t really care. Overarching competence acknowledged, if begrudgingly, yet often viewed as subordinate to grating personality “quirks.” Difficult to feed, let alone have fun with, when staying over in spare bedroom. Viewed as derailing WAI process. Typically the only X in the village irrespective of village or value of X.

COPYRIGHT BY JOE CLARK

Comments (2)

What are you thinking and doing???

My girlfriend told me that she was defused by my action on Children’s Day.

I do have no idea what’s wrong with me.

Have we to make some romantic on that little children’s day??

Comments (3)

COULD IT BE?

I translated this poem last year.

1 year has passed.

Everything is the same but my English level.

I have no idea how to keep learning my English.

save this poem at this place and don’t stop leraning English.

For my postgraduate education.

==================================

COULD IT BE?

==================================

Could it be that I once saw you
In a dream as old as time
And could it be the arms holding you
Were really mine the whole time?

Could you have been my one and only
The reason I woke each new day
The one thing I always needed
The one for whom I use to pray?

Could it be that I had found you
After looking my entire life
Could it be that I had promised
That one day I’d be your wife?

Could it be that I still love you
And once again I’ll find
That you’re not just a memory
Only to be viewed in my mind?

Could it be, oh Lord I pray,
Just one thing I ask of you
If you’re out there waiting
You’ll try to find me too?

我是否是对你一见钟情?
在那个遥远的梦,
是否当你来到我的怀抱,
成为我的,爱会永远 ?你是否是我的唯一?
每个清晨我都意乱情迷,
只有一个愿望,
默默祈祷只为你……

你是否已进入我的心房,
寻找到你,我的一生不再迷茫,
我是否可以承诺,
有一天,我们可以共入洞房?

你是否仍旧让我依恋,
再一次,我发现,
你不再仅仅是一段记忆,
只在我心底出现……

上帝啊,我是否可以祈祷,
祈祷只为一条,
如果你也会等我,
你是否也会苦苦寻找?

Comments

Nobel Prize Owners and their contributions

The Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel – Laureates
2005 Robert J. Aumann, Thomas C. Schelling
“for having enhanced our understanding of conflict and cooperation through game-theory analysis”
2004 Finn E. Kydland, Edward C. Prescott
“for their contributions to dynamic macroeconomics: the time consistency of economic policy and the driving forces behind business cycles”
2003 Robert F. Engle III, Clive W.J. Granger
“for methods of analyzing economic time series with time-varying volatility (ARCH)”
“for methods of analyzing economic time series with common trends (cointegration)”
2002 Daniel Kahneman, Vernon L. Smith
“for having integrated insights from psychological research into economic science, especially concerning human judgment and decision-making under uncertainty”
“for having established laboratory experiments as a tool in empirical economic analysis, especially in the study of alternative market mechanisms”
2001 George A. Akerlof, A. Michael Spence, Joseph E. Stiglitz
“for their analyses of markets with asymmetric ination”
2000 James J. Heckman, Daniel L. McFadden
“for his development of theory and methods for analyzing selective samples”
“for his development of theory and methods for analyzing discrete choice”
1999 Robert A. Mundell
“for his analysis of monetary and fiscal policy under different exchange rate regimes and his analysis of optimum currency areas”
1998 Amartya Sen
“for his contributions to welfare economics”
1997 Robert C. Merton, Myron S. Scholes
“for a new method to determine the value of derivatives”
1996 James A. Mirrlees, William Vickrey
“for their fundamental contributions to the economic theory of incentives under asymmetric ination”
1995 Robert E. Lucas Jr.
“for having developed and applied the hypothesis of rational expectations, and thereby having transed macroeconomic analysis and deepened our understanding of economic policy”
1994 John C. Harsanyi, John F. Nash Jr., Reinhard Selten
“for their pioneering analysis of equilibria in the theory of non-cooperative games”
1993 Robert W. Fogel, Douglass C. North
“for having renewed research in economic history by applying economic theory and quantitative methods in order to explain economic and institutional change”
1992 Gary S. Becker
“for having extended the domain of microeconomic analysis to a wide range of human behaviour and interaction, including nonmarket behaviour”
1991 Ronald H. Coase
“for his discovery and clarification of the significance of transaction costs and property rights for the institutional structure and functioning of the economy”
1990 Harry M. Markowitz, Merton H. Miller, William F. Sharpe
“for their pioneering work in the theory of financial economics”
1989 Trygve Haavelmo
“for his clarification of the probability theory foundations of econometrics and his analyses of simultaneous economic structures”
1988 Maurice Allais
“for his pioneering contributions to the theory of markets and efficient utilization of resources”
1987 Robert M. Solow
“for his contributions to the theory of economic growth”
1986 James M. Buchanan Jr.
“for his development of the contractual and constitutional bases for the theory of economic and political decision-making”
1985 Franco Modigliani
“for his pioneering analyses of saving and of financial markets”
1984 Richard Stone
“for having made fundamental contributions to the development of systems of national accounts and hence greatly improved the basis for empirical economic analysis”
1983 Gerard Debreu
“for having incorporated new analytical methods into economic theory and for his rigorous reulation of the theory of general equilibrium”
1982 George J. Stigler
“for his seminal studies of industrial structures, functioning of markets and causes and effects of public regulation”
1981 James Tobin
“for his analysis of financial markets and their relations to expenditure decisions, employment, production and prices”
1980 Lawrence R. Klein
“for the creation of econometric models and the application to the analysis of economic fluctuations and economic policies”
1979 Theodore W. Schultz, Sir Arthur Lewis
“for their pioneering research into economic development research with particular consideration of the problems of developing countries”
1978 Herbert A. Simon
“for his pioneering research into the decision-making process within economic organizations”
1977 Bertil Ohlin, James E. Meade
“for their pathbreaking contribution to the theory of international trade and international capital movements”
1976 Milton Friedman
“for his achievements in the fields of consumption analysis, monetary history and theory and for his demonstration of the complexity of stabilization policy”
1975 Leonid Vitaliyevich Kantorovich, Tjalling C. Koopmans
“for their contributions to the theory of optimum allocation of resources”
1974 Gunnar Myrdal, Friedrich August von Hayek
“for their pioneering work in the theory of money and economic fluctuations and for their penetrating analysis of the interdependence of economic, social and institutional phenomena”
1973 Wassily Leontief
“for the development of the -output method and for its application to important economic problems”
1972 John R. Hicks, Kenneth J. Arrow
“for their pioneering contributions to general economic equilibrium theory and welfare theory”
1971 Simon Kuznets
“for his empirically founded interpretation of economic growth which has led to new and deepened insight into the economic and social structure and process of development”
1970 Paul A. Samuelson
“for the scientific work through which he has developed static and dynamic economic theory and actively contributed to raising the level of analysis in economic science”
1969 Ragnar Frisch, Jan Tinbergen
“for having developed and applied dynamic models for the analysis of economic processes

Comments (2)

youth

This is the first English article I read.
To tell the trueth, I feel a little shamed to be a college student with so poor English.

Youth

by Samuel Ullman

Youth is not a time of life; it is a state of mind; it is not a matter of rosy cheeks, red lips and supple knees; it is a matter of the will, a quality of the imagination, a vigor of the emotions; it is the freshness of the deep springs of life. Youth means a temperamental predominance of courage over timidity of the appetite, for adventure over the love of ease. This often exists in a man of sixty more than a boy of twenty.

Nobody grows old merely by a number of years. We grow old by deserting our ideals. Years may wrinkle the skin, but to give up enthusiasm wrinkles the soul. Worry, fear, self-distrust bows the heart and turns the spirit back to dust.

Whether sixty or sixteen, there is in every human being’s heart the lure of wonder, the unfailing child-like appetite of what’s next, and the joy of the game of living. In the center of your heart and my heart there is a
wireless station; so long as it receives messages of beauty, hope, cheer, courage and power from men and from the infinite, so long are you young.

When the aerials are down, and your spirit is covered with snows of cynicism and the ice of pessimism, then you are grown old, even at twenty , but as long as your aerials are up, to catch the waves of optimism, there is hope you may die young at eighty.

Comments